Saturday, 30 August 2014

A Message From Martha

A Message From Martha is the title of a book recently published by Bloomsbury; written by Mark Avery it catalogues the demise of the Passenger Pigeon Ectopistes migratorius. Mark writes that we should remember the passenger pigeon because of the largest-scale human-caused extinction in history. The passenger pigeon is among the most famous of American birds, but not because of its beauty, or its 60-mile-an-hour flight speed. But for its extinction from a population of more than 5 billion birds, in the early to mid 19th century, to zero in 1914. 100 years ago this week, the very last pigeon of her kind died in her cage at the Cincinnati Zoo. Her name was Martha, and her passing merits our close attention today.

Mercilessly slaughtered by the tens of millions at breeding colonies in the Northern USA and at huge wintertime roosts in the South during the post-Civil War era, passenger pigeons were shipped by trainloads to dinner tables in homes and restaurants across the East. Their population fell from biblical numbers at midcentury to tiny, aimless flocks in 1890. By around 1900 the few birds that remained were all in captivity. The last male died in 1910, leaving Martha as a barren relic of past abundance.



Martha was the last to die. She was thought to be 29 years old and had never lived in the wild. She is now in the Smithsonian.

At times I found myself reading Avery's book with a lump in my throat. How could this happen? Or be allowed to happen? The statistics on population size, breeding colonies, roosts and migration flocks are simply mind-boggling, completely dwarfing anything we can see today. The Passenger Pigeon was capable of flying at 60 m.p.h. Imagine a flock recorded as being a mile wide, flying overhead for four hours, blanking out the sun - a flock 240 miles long. It stretches the bounds of credulity. And yet so it was.

John Fitzpatrick of Cornell Lab for Ornithology said: We need to imagine Martha asking us, “Have you learned anything from my passing?” Timely conservation action really does work, even for species that have reached alarmingly low numbers. The word 'timely' though, needs to be emphasised. It is easy to say that the Turtle Dove will not become the new Passenger Pigeon - but can we be sure?

I would suggest that 'A Message From Martha' is required reading for anyone interested in conservation and biodiversity and the inevitable fate of many of our endangered species if we don't act now.

Thursday, 28 August 2014

Lunch Club at Bellota's

Our monthly lunch club meetings are calendar days. Time to meet up with old friends, enjoy good food and wine, share anecdotes, discuss books, music, politics, travel and any other subject that takes our fancy. My brother Dave is a legend in musical knowledge, runs a great blog on Live Journal (DavesMusicTank) and is placed currently at No.12 in their list of blogs. No mean feat!

So, here we are again at Bellota's Bar y Tapas in Brighton, our favourite eatery, on a day when the weather was clement and added to the wonderful, convivial atmosphere. Phil had travelled over from Sittingbourne in Kent to join me, my brother and my good friends Graeme, Georgina and Lesley.


Someone referred to this group as 'a bunch of old gits'! That may be so. But we know how to enjoy ourselves. No malingerers here! Mind you, Phil as the youngest member of our esteemed club, would prefer not to be entitled with such a sobriquet!

The food here, as ever, was very tasty. The service was a bit slow today, because Mark - the manager - was having to cope single-handed, owing to being short of staff. He did well and we were in no hurry anyway. Time to dwell over good food, good company and great conversation. And speaking of 'old gits' - here are two at the bar enjoying a Torrés 10 brandy....


Salad days.....

Plans for a Thames Estuary Airport


BTO ecologists have recently reported on controversial proposals to build an airport on the Isle of Grain in the Thames Estuary. The study shows that this development would cause significant loss of coastal habitat within two areas that are protected under European law for their internationally important waterbird populations.

The proposal would cause a significant loss of coastal wetland habitat, largely within the Thames Estuary and Marshes Special Protection Area (SPA), but also affecting the Medway Estuary and Marshes SPA. These areas as already stated are protected under international law for their internationally important bird populations; together they support more than 140,000 waterbirds.

Development at these sites would have significant negative impacts on the bird populations that live there. This would occur through:

1. habitat loss within the footprint of the airport.
2. disturbance or habitat change affecting other areas near the airport.

Over 21,000 waterbirds currently use the area proposed for development. This represents around 25% of the current total bird population on the two affected SPAs and 37% of the current bird population on the Thames Estuary and Marshes SPA.

One can only hope that this alarming proposal does not fly....

Tuesday, 26 August 2014

Barn owls 'threatened' by new legislation

Barn owls, red kites and corncrakes could be killed as invasive species under the Infrastructure Bill, claim experts from the Zoological Society of London.


Twenty four experts from the Zoological Society of London and other organisations including the Natural History Museum and University of Oxford, made the warnings in an open letter to the Government about the potential dangers of the bill, which is published in the journal Nature.

Read more about this insanity here: Daily Telegraph 

Monday, 25 August 2014

Scottish Independence

I watched the second debate tonight between Alistair Darling and Alex Salmond on BBC2. Both camps entered this evening's debate hoping for a late break of opinion in their favour. Darling wants Scotland to remain a part of the United Kingdom. Salmond wants an independent Scotland, a nation state in its own right.

A Guardian/ICM poll suggested Alistair Darling beat Alex Salmond in the first debate. On tonight's viewing I reckon that Salmond came out on top. This seemed to be confirmed by the audience's reaction.

Much of the argument has been about an independent Scotland's right to retain Sterling as its currency, joining a 'currency union' as it were with England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Sterling is supported by the Bank of England and Scotland would be remiss to turn its back on this safe harbour. But the other UK countries might disagree to such an arrangement. Salmond was challenged throughout the debate by Darling as to what his 'Plan B' was. He did not seem to have one.


The 'debate' descended into the anticipated rhetoric with both sides scoring points on such key issues as currency, the National Health Service, oil revenues, Trident, jobs, the welfare state, etc. etc. etc....

Salmond bases a great deal of Scotland's fiscal future on oil revenues. Depending on which NGO's financial forecasts you care to consider, this could be sound or indeed foolhardy. Salmond places significant trust in these revenues providing 15% of an independent Scottish economy. Darling, on the other hand, said that the revenue figures were alarmingly overstated. And so it went on.

As an Englishman I have no influence whatsoever on the outcome of the Scottish Independence referendum, which takes place in three weeks time. As an Englishman I am tired of listening to Alex Salmond, who clearly dislikes anything British that is not Scottish, who is prepared to turn his back on a United Kingdom that has helped in many ways to provide jobs for thousands of Scottish people. He maintains an arrogant air in front of the camera, with a smug look and a dismissive wave of the arm when Darling says something that challenges Salmond's position on any point. And he has still not come up with a 'Plan B' concerning the currency issue.

So, here's my position Mr Salmond, as an Englishman, who has many Scottish friends. I don't give a fig. Stay in the United Kingdom, leave the United Kingdom. I don't give a fig. I will continue to put my support behind Westminster, the house of government for the United Kingdom. And if the good people of Scotland are convinced with your arguments and vote 'Yes' for independence, I won't loose any sleep over it.

But if Scotland does vote 'Yes' in three weeks time you might just find that a lot of chickens come home to roost.....    

Saturday, 23 August 2014

No Post like An Old Post...

Google statistics provide a wealth of information for bloggers about posts, traffic sources, audience, etc. The most read posts tend to be those most recently posted. Makes sense. Why then has an entry I posted on 14th November 2013 rocketed to the top of my Most Read posts list over the last week? Have residents of Grantham suddenly found my blog by sheer coincidence? Or has the limelight suddenly focused on MP Nick Boles? Are there folk out there trying to tell me to 'watch my back'?

Or is it perhaps the badgers that have stimulated this renewed interest in an old blog post?

Curious....


Friday, 22 August 2014

Threat to our Raptors

Birds and animals including the red kite, the goshawk, the barn owl and the wild boar could be completely wiped out of the UK if a new bill to encourage the development of infrastructure is passed, a group of leading scientists warned yesterday.

The threat stems from a new definition of the term “non-native species”, which is so broad that it includes native species that died out in the UK but have since been reintroduced. The labelling means that many species, such as the white-tailed eagle, eagle owl and common crane could be placed at risk as they would be classed as non-native.

It is entirely possible that this legislation could be used to eradicate some native species from the UK. Wild boar, beaver and goshawk are particularly vulnerable. If the bill is passed in its current form it could lead to an irreversible loss of native biodiversity. The legislation could also preclude future species reintroductions.

Some non-native species could also be vulnerable because a landowner only needs to prove economic damage to apply for an order to control or eradicate a species.


A magnificent male Goshawk

You can bet your last pound (OK - bottom dollar) that the real impetus behind this proposed legislation is coming from owners of shooting estates and their gamekeepers, wanting to protect stocks of game-birds for their rich clients to blast out of the skies. 

This alarming proposal must be rejected.